sydney morning herald mention, page-12

Yes Rebel. I believe that is the one. Research Jeffrey Edwards and you should learn more. But be careful, from memory their are two Jeffrey Edwards in the field. Ours is the less accomplished. Basically the confrences were shams and nothing has been published anywhere significant. I can publish a paper if I want. Doesn't make it fact or add value. Look at Climate Change papers as an example and how papers are used to argue for or against.

I wouldn't worry about this article or the 'confrences'. They are known evens and in the past. It doesn't make our product less effective or less profitable. The motive of the author was clearly negative. Bit it is part of the big picture.

Patiently waiting for an update,,,