I believe when company goes into liquidation shareholders become unsecured creditors and put at the end of the queue and nobody will offer them anything except leftovers from asset sales if any. So, I if shareholders what get some of their money back they better vote "yes" to the "loan" proposal. But after that say "no" to allow Bright get more than 50% in the company. I believe that the only way to force Bright to initiate full takeover by itself or together with A2M. And then shareholders might get something meaningful back.
I'm not sure if BusinessDesk is right about 3rd largest shareholder Top 5 shareholders below
A2M Price at posting:
$6.64 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)