SYR or TON? Time to jump ship?, page-146

Hi Oliver, That's exactly what I thought, too, until I read that key sentence carefully. The 0% cutoff is stated as applying:

"Using a block model reporting cut-off grade of zero ... within the modeled mineralized domains"

So it looks like the blocks for the resource calculations have been selected to be within the known mineralized zones.

Let me add that there is nothing illegal about this. But it's just not what a lot of investors, including Oliver1982, and (at first sight), me, thought it meant.

The cross-sections in the TON announcement, and included by Pauldola, show broad areas, of graphite at greater than 5%, between the rich zones. Now that's fine, and could make for a mineable deposit. But where are these selfsame zones in the detailed drill hole reports? As Oliver says, if they are greater than 5%, they should be there. But, no, not mentioned.

Just an oversight? I hope so.

Cheers, Prime1