Should the fact that someone may, or may not, have held stock in...

Should the fact that someone may, or may not, have held stock in another company in the industry invalidate their views today? I would argue that what anybody has held in the past is not relevant. Anyone has a right to reassess their position, which is what PatientMan appears to have done.

For example, Tobyjack herself was a long-time stout supporter, and, L understand, a holder, of AXE. I seriously doubt that she would still have that same view of the company as a likely major graphite producer.

Cheers,

Prime1