Originally posted by Chad3110
Welcome
@BlueDogg to the SYT discussion.
Maybe you should re-read the ENTIRE passage that for some reason you quoted only PART of in your original post. Then you will hopefully see, when the ENTIRE sentence is comprehended in correct context, that individual Director's votes in favour of resolutions that result in their individual benefit should (correctly) be disregarded.
I don't see any issue with the Resolutions you pointed out in your first ever post on Hot Copper. If you are here to stir and try to propagate incorrect information you may find that posters simply won't respond as many of us long-termers no longer feel the need to enter into the angst.
If however you are truely interested in Syntonic as a company you will find a lot of great research and information in this forum. You will also find many helpful posters who are more than willing to assist with answering questions as many of us have been Syntonic shareholders for many years and will continue to hold and purchase while the share price remains in our reach.
All the very best,
Chad's wife
Chads Wife, if there is a conflict of interest, then the party should not partake in the vote, period! It is the democratic process and voicing ones opinion is what I am entitled to. A quick check of the "Pub Test" would highlight public opinion very quickly.
As investors, we want nothing less than compliance. The Banking Royal Commission has turned up so much evidence of non-compliance, its costing peoples lives. Voicing ones opinion or querying how a document is written is a responsibility and obligations of all shareholders, in order to conduct proceedings correctly. Would you not agree?
PS: Is there any particular reason why your responding on someone else's account and not your own?
