IMO, Woodside is more likely to take up a purchase of Hardman's agip's stake than an additional shares in HDR. For Hardman, it is not desirable to issue more shares to Woodside because the shareholders distribution Hardman is very scattered and any stake over 20% would almost give Woodside effective control over the company. i wouldn't do that if I were Ted.
HDR
hardman resources limited
IMO, Woodside is more likely to take up a purchase of Hardman's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)