Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Tactical Nukes, page-13

First 13 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
green potato

18,333 Posts.

39

01/10/22

02:40

Post #: 63976403
Share

Originally posted by LoadedDog: ↑

I think you are right that Ru's tactical nukes are, in reality, too big for tactical use.

People forget that, in so many ways, the US is technically way ahead of Ru/China. Their TNs are 0.1 kts. With that yield the Baltic Fleet could be destroyed without laying waste to the land.

I would suggest that Ru should not even consider going nuclear. If US intelligence hears of this they would lead NATO [or go it alone] in a non-nuclear strike.

The Yanks have experience in this. The F 35s would go in first with anti-radiation rockets. F 18 Growlers will jam any survivors, Under this umbrella they would destroy the Ru aircraft, in the air or on the ground, and then wipe out the heavy armour.

If you think I exaggerate, read up on Desert Storm. There, they only had the rather primitive F 117 Night Hawks but it was text book anyway.

Expand

Absolute rubbish lol

No one knows what Russia have, its as if they gonna tell u what they r capable of.

The military of terrorist regime of america on the other hand is a proven loser that lost pretty much every single war for 70 consecutive years, so there’s nothing to even worth discussing
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

BM8

Battery Age Minerals gets set to capitalise on critical mineral demand

RTR

"One of the most underexplored projects in WA": Rumble boosts MRE to 287Koz

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

FBR

How's that for testament: FBR's robot-made-house survived Hurricane Milton

AAM

AuMEGA notes complex structures in Canada's Bunker Hill through survey work

There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...

First 13 Last

SPONSORED BY