Take action, page-100

- Ok, there seems to be some further misunderstanding - I stated "our type of nanoparticles" not IBX nanoparticles.
Nanotechnology and nanoparticles are employed for the treatment of Anemia.

- The Fed Govt grant for preclinical research for the purpose of prostate cancer imaging agent is alive until it's
communicated otherwise by the Co. I've spoken to IBX on this matter and advise you to do the same if you
have genuine concerns regarding its current validity.

- The $2.6M was an R&D tax incentive, correct - I called it a grant in error.

- In relation to the University of Sydney study, Proven to be the best for low field MRI vs your Proven to work in
low field MRI will require some time for me to find the supporting evidence.