The objection from BHP was because the EL that Caz applied for and was granted overlapped onto BHP's ML. This happens all the time and the objection was to simply redraw the EL off BHP's ML boundary. Hancock naturally appealed because they will use that appeal to sue the tenement manager Rio. How much for? I'd say the market cap of Caz after it gets the decision.
The objection from BHP was because the EL that Caz applied for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 56 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | $2.552K | 134.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 139578 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 425001 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAZ (ASX) Chart |