No one is discussing politics, at least i am not. I was discussing ways of arguing, especially not addressing the points raised, a method I have found common in political discussions. Were I to say "I believe that long standing shareholders should be permitted to participate in any CR alongside those who don't have any skin in the game, especially when options are involved" it is not a relevant response to say "well the shares were cheaper earlier, you are just unhappy that you didn't buy then" I mean WTF does that have to do with anything? And why make an abstract argument personal. ?
Takeover : pool your guesses !, page-29
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AVR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$10.90 |
Change
-0.900(7.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $230.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $11.85 | $11.90 | $10.65 | $1.718M | 157.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1000 | $10.80 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $11.00 | 13000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AVR (ASX) Chart |