Who is summarising the climate with a simple model? That's not what he said.
He said "The only way to build a reliable enough model is to build one with a computer so large that it actually causes climate change"
So, a few things. Does he now in fact accept certain causes of climate change?
What does he mean by reliable? this is emotive language, not scientific. What value does he attribute to reliable'? 50% accurate? 99% accurate?
Again, Hagetaka does not know the basics of science, yet insists on expressing his uneducated opinion. He brought up Climate Change, not me. I'll happily educate him on the subject.
Who is summarising the climate with a simple model? That's not...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,719 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$7.29 |
Change
-0.120(1.62%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.199B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $7.43 | $7.47 | $7.29 | $7.803M | 1.061M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 5565 | $7.29 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.30 | 55579 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.44am 20/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WHC (ASX) Chart |