With all due respect, I believe that you have it backwards. For all its faults, Australia's voting system means that the winner of a constituency vote was preferred by more voters to the one that finished second, and was almost certainly preferred to all the others. In Britain, with its first-past-the-post system, a split vote can put in a candidate who is less liked than either of the candidates who finished 2nd and 3rd. And that really has happened quite a few times. If you want to see how disastrous proportional representation really is, look at NZ. Australia's system is still constituency-focussed, thank goodness.
Then perhaps you could explain to me how it is so good for coal in Britain that they have elected a prime minister promising to be the greenest ever and that Britain will be "carbon neutral" by 2035. Contrast that with Australia where the government - although apparently just as duped or bullied by the climate science fraud - has at least come up with some less damaging policies (still extremely awful, but nothing like as bad).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WHC
- Target $4.80
Target $4.80, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 91 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WHC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$5.73 |
Change
-0.040(0.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.793B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$5.75 | $5.81 | $5.66 | $41.17M | 7.185M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 20670 | $5.72 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$5.75 | 18672 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 20670 | 5.720 |
4 | 22516 | 5.710 |
13 | 38205 | 5.700 |
6 | 152404 | 5.690 |
17 | 94789 | 5.680 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.750 | 18672 | 2 |
5.760 | 44823 | 3 |
5.770 | 126663 | 3 |
5.780 | 63887 | 2 |
5.790 | 50949 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WHC (ASX) Chart |