So, on one hand you argue that Meta and Google are Appen’s...

So, on one hand you argue that Meta and Google are Appen’s biggest source of business and that they will never go in house and that the data demand is increasing - to prove your point that Appen is not becoming redundant.

On the other hand you refute without evidence, that Meta and Google spending cycle is independent of Appen’s revenue - to argue that Appen revenue is not dependent on Meta and Google…

Dear Professor Calvo, I am confused… which is it? You have argued against yourself. You are stating (without evidence) that Appen is both going to continue getting revenue from these big players, and that it is not, at the same time…

Make up your mind. You are clearly hopelessly in love and infatuated with this stock, and completely un-objective.

I’m willing to bet BIG money that Calvo will be too embarrased to respond and refute this. He has obviously argued himself into a corner and has no retort.

Welcome $0.40… 9 months, 18 months tops.