your post is pretty backwards looking. Is it right for a bank (who has to maintain stable capital) to be a 100% dividend play?
Nothing in what you say refutes my point on how riskily the loan book is being grown. Relying on prudential standards is a complete fallacy. There is nothing in the prudential standards which dictate what risks are written and how they are managed. Hoping that APRA will make sure the bank doesn't fail is a complete fallacy.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$4.30 |
Change
-0.010(0.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $727.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $4.31 | $4.33 | $4.29 | $383.5K | 88.96K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6000 | $4.26 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $4.30 | 4805 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.11pm 14/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MYS (ASX) Chart |