Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Tax Cuts, page-25

First 25 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Tarvold

20,834 Posts.

1222

23/05/24

13:17

Post #: 73974957
Share

Originally posted by 1stPrize: ↑

in fact it is a net loss of tax revenue.
interesting thought the one concerning what is a "loss" of tax revenue. anything less than 100% tax on everything is a "loss" of tax revenue.

i think about the $300 that is about to be given away to every household for the electricity give-away........ did the government collect $300 too much in the first place? and then decide to give it back to every house cos they had collected too much tax and had no other use for that money? (like hospitals or schools).... and then spend millions $$ more of tax money to tell us about the tax money it is returning.

makes me wonder if it would be better if the government just collected less tax in the first place rather than just give out the excess tax it has collected.

Expand

,$300 isn't excess tax, it's funded through debt.
Australia has a massive debt level, you could never accuse it of collecting too much tax
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

WCN

White Cliff gears up to explore expanded Nunavut Cu-Ag-Au project in Canada

RXM

Rex Minerals soars 60% on $390M Indonesian buyout deal from MACH Australia

HCH

Hot Chili sets up water company as drought racks Chile–but must also build communities a desal plant

PMT

High-grade lithium zone extended at Patriot's Corvette project, drilling grades at 5%

CXO

Core Lithium narrowly beats guidance on FY24 spodumene production but 1Y returns still shattered

There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...

First 25 Last