At the weekend I took another quick look at Masters V Cameron and one thing jumped out at me straight away.
In that case a deposit was paid in relation to the agreed terms and that was a sign of the intention to be bound.
Now I remember at the trial Justice Kenneth Martin asking why MZN had not paid anything to KDR, we know the reason why that was, they didn't have anything agreed officially.
At the weekend I took another quick look at Masters V Cameron...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)