There is no connection between Juro and TLX in regards their...

There is no connection between Juro and TLX in regards their respecitve subpoena's no matter what alleged AI engines infer or imply.

There might, at a very long stretch, be some secondary correlation but it bears no relevance to the SEC subpoena issued to TLX.

AI is not artifical intelligence, that is yet to evolve and has a long way to go. The current wave of fascination is merely predictive analytics or maybe for defining risks or invesment probabilities is heurisitc modelling at a stretch and it is being used loosely by some of the US biggest companies. The net result is any use of AI will render you a result that is US-centric basded on existing data available to them hence it remains somewhat ignorant inother regions. In medical research it is very much predictive analytics as it uses large datasets or bodies/repositories of research and patient case data to define an argument, an outcome or probabilities. The legal system will be an interesting and somewhat frightening proposition if it starts to apply glibly "AI" to case manegement. Tesla and Google are screwing with driverless cars and that allegedy applies AI, it doesn't, it is predictive analytics in a real-time basis.

Natural intelligence is rare enough in this day and age let alone replicating it to machines who then act/initiate or respond at speeds unrecognisable to humans is just.....(insert your own words).

Can we put to rest the Juro - TLX discussion once and for all.

Cheers,
AO