Telstra loses accc battle on wholesale, page-4

Seems the telstra argument was not that strong as has been suggested tls could have/should have ? put conditions in nbn agreement as per increased costs of supplying remaining customers as nbn rolled out and customers transferred as per migration payments.
On the other hand,completely different argument regarding tls's,optus and vodafones privately owned mobile technology,equipment and spectrum combined with no monopoly ie 3 mobile owners with the added argument that vodafone could buy the required spectrum now if they want to compete in regional australia.
So i can understand the courts wholesale ruling argument,but i can't c the courts agreeing with the accc regarding nationalisation of tls's,optus and potentially vodafones mobile networks (ie to tpg from vodafone) technology,equipment and spectrum.
As posted that leaves the transmission lines that r already declared,the mobile towers that tls and optus say vodafone can install their equipment on but vodafone must use its own spectrum (obviously}.
ps and this imo is y tls will never buy back the nbn in its current form,who with any sanity would buy back a monopoly regulated by the accc.
The sooner the nbn is rolled out and tls no longer has responsibility for their crap network the sooner tls will start serious cost cutting and start receiving their govt inflation linked rental in full,not to mention a much simplified business model where tls,s inability to run certain businesses becomes very obvious.Hopefully resulting in a new management team that can change the perception of tls being a bond and not a growth stock which it should b.