IMO,
Its really quite simple.
Right at the onset of sale PC clearly stated,that COP was choosing a different sale path.
One that had not been tested in court before.
So,WPL went along with it.
PC said, it's up to COP to deliver the asset to us.
This selling the Company approach by COP forms the basis of COP'S indemnification to WPL.
It is still there, until the risk of WPL losing the Asset has Passed.
Kimbo79
IMO,Its really quite simple.Right at the onset of sale PC...
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
52.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.05M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 52.0¢ | 52.0¢ | 52.0¢ | $30.26K | 58.21K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 791 | 52.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0¢ | 10000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.56pm 04/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |