Tesla moving to iron phosphate lithium batteries for standard-range electric cars, page-87

Draft in progress, with some updates now:
To the more experienced punters out there - Feel free to pitch in

Note: Grading 1-10 with 1 meaning very low on the aspect scale and 10 being the highest.
1. Sector Criticality
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
Mineral on Critical List?
Mineral is a future technological enabler?
Sector has large TAM?
Is the process sufficiently vertically integrated?
What value add has been foreseen?
2. Resource & Reserve
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
Is this a multi-decade resource?
Is the grade economical compared to competitors?
Is there scope for resource and reserve expansion?
3. Board of Directors
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
Are there at least two members who have industry specific experience?
Does the corporate governance require skin-in-the-game from the BoD?
Are the renumeration packages comparative to successful peers?
4. Brief History from Inception
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
Ability to focus on one or two projects and progress them sufficiently
History of share re-capitalisation or consolidation
Evidence of partnering with the right investors, technology movers
5. Current Achievements
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
6. Sovereign Risk
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
What is the Frasier Institute annual survey rating?
Are there any regaion specific risks to the project
What is the cultural attitude towards mining historically?
7. Financials
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)
Anecdotal evidence of cash burn rates
Sufficiently low C1 and AISC?
8. Peer Comparison Brief
Aspect	Comments	Grade (1-10)