You might also want to make more of the accuracy and conspiracy...

You might also want to make more of the accuracy and conspiracy theory - this always piques an interest of Journo's if they can ask curly questions of pollies to make them squirm - looks good on the news

.Perhaps highlight ...... that whilst the accuracy of RATs is reported in the media as 70% or worse ,this is in fact incorrect - a little Aussie company tested by the Doherty Institute has returned result of 97% accuracy (comparable to existing PCR tests results), it provides a result in 15 minutes while the patient waits, and at a fraction of the cost compared to the current 'gold standard' PCR test. The PCR test we understand is $150 per test, and is currently being paid for by the Australian taxpayers and any visiting individual or family.
There has previously been some mention made already as to why RATS are not being used and the incorrect reporting of their efficacy due to the influence of big Pharma companies. We ask why a RATS test with this high accuracy is being withheld from the Australian public. - is it to benefit big pharma's ........

Just thoughts