From the TGA mandate Firstly, there are a number of significant...

From the TGA mandate
Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community.

It has to be a politician who wrote this because it actually uses sixty seven words to say nothing
All through this ivermectin bashing campaign there has never been a medical reason for it to be banned simply because there are none
It says that there are a number of significant health risks assassinated with taking it

But then they don't list those risks apart from some vague comment you could spread the virus
This when it is documented that after you get vaccinated you become a super spreader

The question that should be asked is why our government department is denying people access to ivermectin. I can fully understand Big Pharma's role they are in it for the money, is our government also in it for the money ?

Another gem
Finally, there has been a 3-4-fold increased dispensing of ivermectin prescriptions in recent months, leading to national and local shortages for those who need the medicine for scabies and parasite infections.

It has not really caused deaths withing Australia, ivermectin has only been used by 36% of the cases, it is a cheap readily available drug so just import more or set up a plant here to produce it

However, prescribing of oral ivermectin for indications that are not approved is now limited to certain specialists.
As to it not being banned just see if you can find the people who can/will prescribe it

Generally it is apparent by the statement that the government are happier to have people die rather than allow a known drug to be used