how did you get that conclusion?
They are based on power plant demand and construction. If demand slows how does that stop the building of and demand by powerplants and the fact that uranium supply is getting worse?
Doesn't the population still need electricity in a recession or does that suddenly become a discretionary item lmao.
Infact wouldn't powerplants be cheaper to maintain/construct given the deflationary effects of a recession and thus uranium prices can rise further given that their bottom line has more leway before it becomes uneconomical to produce electricity.
how did you get that conclusion?They are based on power plant...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ASX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$63.84 |
Change
0.070(0.11%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.37B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $64.41 | $64.52 | $63.59 | $17.98M | 281.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1141 | $63.70 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $63.84 | 905 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ASX (ASX) Chart |