Poor Daq (privacy /#q and any other of the numerous aliases). You accuse me of ramping LUM at 93 cents. I challenge you to supply the proof. I know you wont be able to cos there is none. Unlike you I have always said I held shares in LUM. You consistently deny any interest in LUM. For a person who has no interest LUM consumes an inordinate amount of your time. It is the stock you post not a majority of posts on, but something more than a substantial majority. A percentage which makes the dictator's percentages look lame. The truth is as you have admitted ( and I have got the posts) you actively trade in LUM whilst denying it everytime. Im sure if ASIC /ASX ever acquired balls they would investigate you and then prosecute you. Rene got three months you would probably get life.
posted on oz stock 10/3/05
hmm end of feb huh
Miscman's opinions on LUM are also very interesting. When Miscman says he has a small holding in LUM he fails to tell you that as at end of Feb 2005 his company held at least 650,000 shares in LUM.
Rednblu
[email protected]
Poor Daq (privacy /#q and any other of the numerous aliases)....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)