The arbitration ,mining licence or compo?, page-21

Your words show the real interest of the non-owners here. Why, when I care about Greenland and the welfare of its people, would I sell a mine that is supposedly so dangerous and unwanted? I could point this out and stop the project. But no, it had to be sold and certainly at a high price? And now you are suddenly in competition. Furthermore, here in Greenland they say how much they are against uranium and how little ppm they have. In contrast, in another place they are somehow still connected to uranium. What kind of credibility is that? In addition, ggg at least focuses on Greenland, which is seen as a disadvantage by some here. I would say from a trust perspective it can be an advantage!