The purpose of a parliament in a Democracy is to amend/change laws in relation to current practices so that they are fair an equitable as per the Government of the day's electoral mandate.
If Conservative laws and practices were ideal, then its arguable that parliament would not be needed, nor would elections; just a court/judicial system to administer the existing Conservative Laws and their interpretations .
BUT we have Democracy which means a compulsory vote to elect Government with mandates to change the laws. That's called "Progressive" not necessarily RW or LW but historically somewhere in between.
The Holy Roman Empire lasted for centuries (the Dark Ages) run on the Conservative Judeo-Christina principles where the Pope and his Bishops were the arbiters of political values and the Church body was Judge & Jury. Muslims under Sharia Law operate in a similar way today and we are not great fans of that.....eh?
So in summary, Conservatives dont want change and as a result are anti-democratic because no change implies a no need for elected representatives to change the law ....therefore no Parliament; just a bureaucratic regime to administer.
If on the other hand we want laws to be improved on an ongoing basis such as we have now, then that's Progressive; not Conservative
