Nope your just pushing more of you extreme lw biased crap

First 6 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
UniversalTrader

21,772 Posts.

56

26/01/23

09:23

Post #: 65889970
Share

Originally posted by moorookamick: ↑

The purpose of a parliament in a Democracy is to amend/change laws
in relation to current practices so that they are fair an equitable as per
the Government of the day's electoral mandate.

If Conservative laws and practices were ideal, then its arguable
that parliament would not be needed, nor would elections;
just a court/judicial system to administer the existing Conservative
Laws and their interpretations .

BUT we have Democracy which means a compulsory vote to elect
Government with mandates to change the laws. That's called
"Progressive" not necessarily RW or LW but historically somewhere
in between.

The Holy Roman Empire lasted for centuries (the Dark Ages)
run on the Conservative Judeo-Christina principles where
the Pope and his Bishops were the arbiters of political values
and the Church body was Judge & Jury. Muslims under Sharia
Law operate in a similar way today and we are not great fans
of that.....eh?

So in summary, Conservatives dont want change and as a result
are anti-democratic because no change implies a no need for
elected representatives to change the law ....therefore no Parliament;
just a bureaucratic regime to administer.

If on the other hand we want laws to be improved on an ongoing
basis such as we have now, then that's Progressive; not Conservative

Expand

Nope your just pushing more of you extreme lw biased crap
21 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

SYR

Syrah jumps +19% as graphite tariff threat spurs optimism down under

HotCopper Highlights: Trigg; Droneshield; Lumos & more

DRO

History repeats for DroneShield investors but carnage so far subdued

BDM

Burgundy plunges -20% after turning to layoffs to navigate record-low diamond prices