The battle for iSignthis, page-50

First 50 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Anaximines

471 Posts.

445

19/03/23

22:21

Post #: 66848787
Share

Originally posted by tradealot: ↑

.

Hi @ChillingOut & @Anaximines

Working from evidence, there has been no reporting from AFR post the first Friday of the hearing 3/3.... that's when ASIC airing there grievances finished. Nothing of ISX defence, not a word. https://www.copyright link/company/isx-tm

The SMH artice was 90% an overview history of the charges against isx, and then it chronologically followed the asic narrative in court in the first week when asic commanded the floor. As soon as it was ISX's turn to provide there defence in the second week, a few brief sentences were reported... hardly balanced.

Isn't balanced 50/50 - I even think 60/40 could work, but 90/10 is definitely not balanced reporting. For those who want to read the smh artice being discussed, cut and paste the following into your search engine, its free to view.... "The battle for iSignthis: General missing in action as fintech fights for its reputation"

Re "Justice McEvoy's decision is only one that matters. Not yours, mine, or any journalist."

Maybe from an outcome and finalization perspective I agree the courts decision is important. However the media controls the destiny and direction of any individual or business from the narrative they push. It's all by design to lead the public to the conclusion that's required by pushing the one sided articles painted in a negative light for years after year.

So by the time the courts final verdict is given 4 yrs later, the damage has been done, the perceptions have been moulded out there in the public by the constant bombardment of negative articles all based on assumptions, and the destiny of the person or company's been effected or ruined. Mission accomplished

And what if all this negative press is wrong. Getting a courts verdict in favour of isx isn't going to make that all the negative go away, recoup any loses, and reinstate things pre suspension like nothing happened. Cheers

.

Expand

Mate - read what I wrote - I am no way suggesting that the press are fair and balanced. Nor am I suggesting ISX gets a balanced reporting from the AFR - they don't. Just pointing out the stupidity of Swami saying facts need to be reported in a balanced fashion - really? facts are either reported or they are not. "Balanced reporting of facts" is a misunderstanding of what a fact is. Selective reporting of facts is possibly what he meant.

Anyways, the press provide factual reporting, analysis, commentary, opinion and scuttlebutt. ISX get bad press from the AFR. Is it unfair? maybe, but so is life get used to it.

SP1 Price at posting: $1.07 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

NVU

Nanoveu surges 10% after benchmark testing for new AI chip begins

MTH

Mithril's drilling in Mexico picks up silver at 997g/t, gold at 28g/t

Week 42 Wrap: HotCopper's top picks; new ASX 200 record; world yawns at war

SWP

Swoop lobs $18M offer at microcap telecom Vonex – in which it holds 19.9%

TLG

Talga Group wins key permit for flagship graphite mine in Sweden

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

SNX

Sierra Nevada raises $2M for silver exploration at Blackhawk

IRX

InhaleRX snags $38.5M in funding from VC biotech funder Clendon

What's causing the cost-of-living crisis, and how to navigate it

M4M

Macro, Norden set up transport solutions initiative for West Pilbara