The big question is, page-4

I don't think anything will 'sway sentiment'. If and when revenue is significant, buyers will come - it won't be 'sentimental' buying. The market attitude is well-founded, after all.

It is one thing to spruik and fluff - it goes with the territory of trying to generate interest in a developing company. However, opportunistic Director selling into an unustainable spike caused by misleading and confusing announcements does not endear a company to the market.

The $20m revenue target was a terribly cynical ploy - easily seen in retrospect as the corporate equivalent of attaching a 'kick me' sticker on the back of shareholders.

Then came 'stock-grab-gate', based on a legal technicality, then clumsily rescinded.

I want to hear some facts and clear exposition, including clarification of the meaning and consequences of the wave one wand 'release' and some evidence of sensible corporate planning in this investor call, not random, vague meanderings and excuses.