Yes agreed BIG is usually bad for effiency It was all the thing...

  1. 25,363 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 29
    Yes agreed BIG is usually bad for effiency

    It was all the thing to get more branches to a business at one stage and in mine I got up to five at one time and realized that it was a time waster, conditions were different in each location plus the inevitable time wated meeting etc so I split them into five totally separate stand or fall on your own two feet, much beterIt woks for cities as well . IE Melbourne 100 km from one side to the other with fractured services tying to service the lot

    From memory the Greeks had a limit that when a city reached certain point any more people had to start a new city

    Interesting to listen to Elon Musk with his method of running a big business, very enlightening
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.