Yes agreed BIG is usually bad for effiency
It was all the thing to get more branches to a business at one stage and in mine I got up to five at one time and realized that it was a time waster, conditions were different in each location plus the inevitable time wated meeting etc so I split them into five totally separate stand or fall on your own two feet, much beterIt woks for cities as well . IE Melbourne 100 km from one side to the other with fractured services tying to service the lot
From memory the Greeks had a limit that when a city reached certain point any more people had to start a new city
Interesting to listen to Elon Musk with his method of running a big business, very enlightening
- Forums
- Economics
- The Biggest Global Asset Bubble That Ever Was And Ever Will Be.
Yes agreed BIG is usually bad for effiency It was all the thing...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)