"the difference here is bolt was found to be factually wrong."
well, the facts seem to be based on the hearsay of the people who Bolt criticised
they wouldn't be so stupid as to admit that they used their aboriginality to get ahead.
People rarely admit to their real motivations I find How do you know if the "fair skinned" aboriginals concerned are not saying what they are saying just to win the court case and cause Bolt the maximum damage?
