After reading Bowler's explanation I conclude that you can ignore the "fairness" reason provided as it contradicts the tone and implicit meaning of the document.
While I'm not a mind reader, reasons (1) and (2) seem to be simply saying, "Rio's bigger, it has more money, it invests more and it's important not to anger this monster".
I think the above is logical; power politics if you will.
The public interest is served by placating the Rio monster, so was Bowler's judgement.
As to the legal and equity related arguments, sure CAZ may be "right" but it does not have the "might", and as the minister has discretionary powers - i.e. room to maneuver - don't be surprised at the outcome.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CAZ
- the bowler blunder - a reasoned argument
the bowler blunder - a reasoned argument, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.458M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | $3.904K | 278.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 572480 | 1.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.4¢ | 11600 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 572480 | 0.013 |
5 | 1335346 | 0.012 |
2 | 1300000 | 0.011 |
1 | 100000 | 0.010 |
1 | 120000 | 0.008 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.014 | 11600 | 1 |
0.016 | 157582 | 2 |
0.017 | 56000 | 1 |
0.018 | 625000 | 1 |
0.019 | 671540 | 2 |
Last trade - 12.09pm 07/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CAZ (ASX) Chart |