Hi Friends,Since we're on a 'good thing' we might just as well...

First 705 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
soccer5

271 Posts.

94

24/03/21

16:59

Post #: 52011285
Share

Originally posted by soccer5: ↑

Hyer Gj @gj0201 and Friends,

I know I shoudn't, I mustn't, but I will - do you remember these lines from the Dick Emmery show? No? ah, ah - you're a youngster.

But here it goes:

JAT -

Now, a bit of background.

You'll all remember what a success story A2M was, and the opperative word is 'was'.

I spotted a crowd being set up by our Chinese friends to basically take over the business of A2M without paying for it and got out of the stock (A2M) asap.

Now we have another outfit addressing the needs of a growing market in an increasingly more affluent society. But this company is listed downunder.

I could be wrong (first time, of course), but this could go 'to the moon', or to $20- or thereabouts.

As usual, I never 'tip' a stock without buying it myself. I hold it.

Attached a chart for JAT which does look promising.

Cheers,

soccer

cc: @taughtbuffet

Expand

Hi Friends,

Since we're on a 'good thing' we might just as well keep going.

JAT -

On the 15th of Feb I mentioned this stock here and a few wise traders ( @gj0201 ) made a motza. Well done.

I'm holding this stock for the longer term ( could be wrong, not first time, but I'm a major s/h and not trading it short term ). Heck, I might think of selling when it gets past $2-, unless the Boss tells me to do it before.

The stock then reached 4.0 cents, just above the Fib projection of 3.8 cents and since had a pullback to 2.3 cents.

It is showing signs that it wants to go up, perhaps in the expectation of some good news via an expected announcement.

Using the Fib projection again, the Target is 5.1 cents. Co-incidentally, this is the same level as using a different approach. @W3hunter would you mind please confirming my figures. Thanks in advance. I know you're a holder also.

Cheers e Boa Sorte,

soccer

Chart attached:

XSO Value at posting: 3,160.4
8 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply