the ceo bought shares too!!

< Interestingly.....The CEO and or senior management do NOT own one single share. >

A LIE!!

What is interesting is, the "fact" and question to you, of .....

Why would Directors be buying (at market) in this reporting quarter, if they did not feel, things were going ok?

Date Insider Shares Type Transaction Value*
28-Feb-06 WETSEL, GARY A
Director 5,000 Direct Purchase at $4.60 - $4.63 per share. $23,0002
23-Feb-06 HILLS, DAVID B.
Chief Executive Officer 5,000 Direct Purchase at $4.59 - $4.69 per share. $23,0002

Now you show me a notice to the market, as to where they have sold these above shares, they bought "at market" ..... Ok?

But you haven't "trotted out" the fact, that "short" activity has increased, yet? Why?

Elsewhere you said:

< 246k this month over 191k last month someone is expecting the price to fall.>

I had replied to this, that (in fact), the SP value had reached it's 12 month "high", of $5.75c, during this period.

Due to your poor comprehension "skills", you then replied .......

< Ross.....i know you are too bright....BUT!!!! LOOK hit $5.75 in MARCH!!!!!! NOT April!!!!

i remind you,........the short sellers have increased in APRIL. >

I then "stuck it up you" once more, with:

< LOOK hit $5.75 in MARCH!!!!!! NOT April!!!! >

Yes, it was the 29th of march, actually ..... Righ in the middle of the reporting period!! If only you could read & comprehend!!!

barry, are you "losing it", possibly?

< i remind you,........the short sellers have increased in APRIL. > (is what you said)

Exactly!! So, in spite of the increase in "shorts" by some 53,200 shares, (between 15/3 & 13/4) the shareprice was STILL able to move up to that "12 month high figure", and on 13/4 it closed at, $5.08c ...... since then, I'd venture to say, that "shorts" figure may have increased even more!! Yet, the SP is down ONLY, .13cps, since 13/04/2006.

Apr. 13, 2006 245,065 134,914 1.82
Mar. 15, 2006 191,864 84,245 2.28

SMUGGS, AN INCREASE IN SHORT ACTIVITY (in fact) IS DESIGNED TO RETARD THE GROWTH OF THE SP VALUE. (Now, I do hope that you would realise that?)

And, that as shares are sold, someone is buying them!

They, (those who are buying), are effectively getting a "bargain" from those who are 'shorting' .... Surely you wouldn't dispute that?

Now, as to WHO will have made the correct decision, remains to be seen following market close, on this coming thursday afternoon, 04/04/2006.

But, I WANT YOU TO CONSIDER ONE MORE THING ....

If, the shorts hadn't increased by 28% during this period, what price do you feel LOOK would be at, by now? With the reality of, more that 53,000 more buyers, than sellers, during this period???

And, guess what, (as I have said earlier), I'd say it is ONLY shorts, that have kept LOOK's SP value, down at it's current closing levels!!

If you think this is an indication of shareholders SELLING, you have "rocks in your head" ..... But you already do, don't you??

:)
LC

ps; You then wen't & "hid" back under your usual rock!!!