I enjoy reading your scrutiny
@Mason14 but this comment...............
"I suspect the IV administration showed no efficacy, which is why the results were not stated in this publication."
Are you seriously suggesting they manipulated the results of this paper by excluding an entire arm of the study because they didn't like what they saw?
Presumably all of the authors would have had to know about, and agree to this. All 16 of them. Most of them oncologists, surgeons and researchers from the City of Hope.
And for what purpose? To force it into a Phase 1 that would inevitably fail?
This comment is absurd.
And offensive to the authors.
(20min delay)