Etherazer, your substantive response is noted. I doubt I could crack you up though: wide fractures were already apparent.
oh dear Seagull, you're really clutching at chips. yes I do accept that Etherazer's temperature data was correct and no I don't accept your claim that the data underpinning the science of global warming and climate change is fraudulent. what's your point?
let me say it again, data for one location on Earth isn't a proxy for Earth.
M, I fully accept that you just "know." what that has to do with anyone else is anyone else's guess.
