Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

The Clintons, page-13

First 13 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bruceyg

34,942 Posts.

3

24/04/18

08:20

Post #: 32644468
Share

Originally posted by Glug ↑

Reince Priebus' False claim that 80% of Clinton Foundation costs are overhead

By Aaron Sharockman on Thursday, August 25th, 2016 at 10:53 a.m.

We’ll use the Clinton Foundation’s most recent IRS tax form, for 2014, as an example. (It starts on Page 28 of this document.) The foundation reported total expenses in 2014 of a little over $91 million but grants of just $5.1 million. That’s close to 6 percent of the foundation’s money being spent on grants.

Over a five-year period from 2009-12, the foundation raised over $500 million, the conservative website The Federalist reported, but only 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went toward grants.

But that doesn’t mean everything else is overhead, people who monitor charities and their practices say.

View attachment 1071844

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-priebus-false-claim-80-clinton-foundation-c/

Expand

not sure what you tried to achieve here except shooting yourself in the foot.

basis of the matter is that only 6% went out as aid as your article shows
10 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Pilot Energy awarded $6.5M in govt funding for Mid West Clean Energy Project

ARU

Arafura updates on total US$1B funding as export banks and lenders take notice; heading toward FID for Nolans

M4M

Macro Metals picks up 80% in Firebird's manganese plays; mining services operations to launch if decision to mine passed

ITM

iTech Minerals flags high-grade rockchip finds, boasting one sample at +18% copper. What lies underground remains to be seen

DTM

Dart on-target for high-grade structures and multiple reefs at VIC's Rushworth

There are more pages in this discussion • 57 more messages in this thread...

First 13 Last

SPONSORED BY