Yes , that is partially right . That's why I made the comment about their figures being a bit rubbery and added a reasonable amount to the price . Their model also doesn't include financing , planning etc .
It could easily be higher than my estimates but I'm not really worried about price so much . Especially when it's such a long term investment . It's more about the practicality and the suitability long term .
Yes , you could bring units on progressively but that actually complicates the process a bit . You still have common infrastructure components that would still have to be built first . Let's say it took 4 years to start bringing it on progressively ?
The other thing is that they are talking about ' replacing the fleet ' . So it seems that there isn't really a big capacity bonus . A lower emission bonus and some better reliability maybe ?
You can see why I question these claims by the Monash Forum and their fanboys on here . I am not against fossil at all . I dread the idea of Labor winning the federal election and imposing their ideologic 50% renewables by 2030 without any idea of how to do it .
We've had the debacle of SA and now Hazelwood . But fortunately the feds have pulled their finger out and have come up with a plan which I think is reasonable . A steady , sensible transition to renewables . Prices are now under control and should get cheaper over time , especially for business . Retailers are on notice to lift there game . Frydenberg was questioned about this on Insiders . There is no doubt the government is getting involved .
To my mind it is entirely feasible to transition to renewables over a long period . The benefits are lower emissions of things like sulphur , mercury etc . It's not just about CO2 . It is also about price . Mining fossil is only getting more expensive . Renewables have the potential to get very , very cheap . We can also stop digging big holes and using heaps of water in cooling towers . The fossil resource can still be used for other purposes and recycled , thus making it an almost endless supply forever . The investment in the grid modifications and the installation of renewable/storage infrastructure is also a great employer and should stimuale a lot of business . If you want to create a few skilled techical jobs you may as well do it in something that is a really long term investment for the country .
I just hate all the bs that surrounds these subjects . Let's tease out the facts and get on with it .
- Forums
- Political Debate
- The Coalition
Yes , that is partially right . That's why I made the comment...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online