One lucky break doesnt mean he is successful, why any management would considered giving away around 50% of the company, putting them in $10m dollars debt doesnt say he knows what he is doing Possible the reason that they couldn't get the deal past ASX was just the fact it wasn't in the best interest of shareholders. What deal has Hopper or Baker delivered that has created shareholder value, the fact they have delivered nothing more than the Mitsubishi second deal, this with a company that has failed to progress the first deal.
The fact Hopper changed the TGA submission and failed to report this, tells you he cares nothing about shareholders, this after reporting he was improving shareholder value and share holder confidence. Why did Teva not appear on the list of Suda partners / companies, In the announcement, is there something else that Hopper has over looked. (Remember that the Teva MAA was submitted back in 2017) the out come expected in December 2018, here we are June 2020 and nothing.
SUD Price at posting:
4.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)