''The connection is there alright, you can't get the fig tree event out of your brain and the generation subject as they ARE NOT part of the verses, some standing here as the proceeding verses are their alignment.''
You may see a connection, but what you see may be flawed. Consider the possibility that your perception is biased, you see what you want to see because your desire and your belief filters your understanding of the text. Plus, assuming for the sake of argument that the connection is there, you have not described that connection well enough for others to see. You simply quote a verse and claim ''there is the connection'' as if it's obvious. It is not. So you have not made a case for your claim.
Meanwhile, nothing changes the terms and references of the verses I quoted. It would be silly if there was....why say one thing and then have another verse that changes the meaning to the opposite of what was said.
The fact is, you have no case. You are attempting to reconcile the irreconcilable using desperate claims. It is not working. It cannot work because clearly the verses say what they say and mean what they mean, and they are not talking about something else.
