The dean dilemma: The Great Betrayal: How Science Bent Reality to Obey Logic- The systematic incoherence and inconsistency of reality-the dean paradox
or
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/The-dean-dilemma.pdf
or
scribd
The Sacred Tyranny of Logic: When Reality Is Forced to Conform
This essay will prove
In bending reality to logic logic continually breaks down such that
science mathematics philosophy ie everyone are constrained by the inherent flaws of logic- which continually create an incoherence and inconsistent unreliable account of reality
when realityis made to bend to logic what we get is empiricism rationalism etc , like allphilosophical systems dependent on human reasoning (Aristotle Plato Hume KantHegel Schopenhauer Nietzsche Wittgenstein Russell Quine science mathematicsphilosophy ie everyone) is constrained by the inherent flaws of logic, and cannot guarantee a coherent or reliableaccount of reality
thus we see
the collapse of Aristotle, Kant, Einstein, and Loop Quantum Gravity(LQG) under the crushing force when reality is made to bend to logic
Dean’s paradox(of colinleslie dean) highlights a core discrepancy between logical reasoning and lived reality.Logic insists that between two points lies an infinite set of divisions,making it "impossible" to traverse from start to end. Yet, inpractice, the finger does move from the beginning to the end in finite time.This contradiction exposes a gap between the abstract constructs of logic andthe observable truths of reality.
Zeno said motion isimpossible dean says motion is possible with the consequence of the deanparadox
·
· http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/The-dean-paradox.pdf
·
· Or
· scribd
·
· https://www.scribd.com/document/849019262/The-Dean-Paradox-science-mathematics-philosophy-Zeno
what follows is just not about logicphilosophy science it is about the very nature of the monkey(homo-sapiens) it is seen in how it defines itself ie Latin homo ie man sapiens ie wise This wise-man makes itself the centre of the universe and sees itself almost god-like it sees its brain its mind its logic as the supreme force for truth everything in the universe it bends to itself its mind its logic Nietzsche called it the “will to power” Even the gods themselves have human characteristic which can be bent to this wise- man thru say his prays his rites his mysteries So what we see in science in philosophy is just what we see in his god he bends everything to him because for science philosophy they believe-even not consciously –that their logic is supreme and reality must bend on its knees to this wise-man
EXAMPLE General Relativity
There are two different mathematical models of reality ie its geometry Einsteins General relativity and the Brans–Dicke theory, but they both give the same observations from their different mathematical realities
The existence of General Relativity (GR) and Brans-Dicke (BD) theory, which offer different geometric descriptions of gravity but yield very similar observational results, is a powerful illustration of how scientific models "bend reality to fit logic" or, at least, how our "monkey brains" can construct multiple, observationally equivalent "realities."
The crucial distinction is that Brans-Dicke theory includes this scalar field, which dynamically changes the gravitational "constant" and, consequently, the spacetime geometry. General relativity, on the other hand, assumes a fixed gravitational constant and relies solely on the metric to describe spacetime
GRuses a mathematical framework called Riemannian geometry (specifically,pseudo-Riemannian geometry for spacetime) to describe this curvature.
but
: While BD theory still uses a metric tensor anddescribes spacetime curvature, the presence and dynamics of the scalar field mean that the gravitational interaction ismediated by both the curvature of spacetime and the scalar field.In some formulations, this can lead to interpretations where the underlyinggeometry is not purely Riemannian but might involve concepts likeWeylgeometry,
