Obviously, I am no lawyer, but my reading of the DFA is that if COAST or shore fails, then the investor can walk away without being obligated to contribute additional funds, far enough, there is no path so no extra $.
However, I cannot fathom why any legal pathway that that means they walk away with the company's assets, including the $$$ in the bank account from the CR and SPP.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
60.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $738.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| OPT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable