Contested, in the legal parlance, would mean no evidence - not theory or conjecture - put forth that challenges or impugns the nature of the evidence by Patel.
So say in a trial, a ballistic expert testifies it was "x,y,z cal from said gun" and nothing contested that by way of competing evidence it would an uncontested fact the jury would take into account
Now if there was someone else in the room with a different view that would be another matter
Ohhhh wait..there was. Donald Trump
Case goes away
- Forums
- World Politics
- The F.B.I. convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed
The F.B.I. convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed, page-301
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 750 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online