Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

The F.B.I. convince a judge that it had probable cause that a crime had been committed, page-303

First 303 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tangs

35,417 Posts.

495

16/08/22

16:12

Post #: 63146148
Share

Originally posted by hersuit: ↑

Contested, in the legal parlance, would mean no evidence - not theory or conjecture - put forth that challenges or impugns the nature of the evidence by Patel.

So say in a trial, a ballistic expert testifies it was "x,y,z cal from said gun" and nothing contested that by way of competing evidence it would an uncontested fact the jury would take into account

Now if there was someone else in the room with a different view that would be another matter

Ohhhh wait..there was. Donald Trump

Case goes away

Expand

Contested, in the legal parlance, would mean no evidence

how is it you guys lie so easily ?
it means nothing of the sort - means the evidence , or the construction of it or the significance of it are being contested is all ...in the legal parlance !
7 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 748 more messages in this thread...

First 303 Last