" The Cazaly case isn't directly comparable in my opinion, as the tenement was 'accidentally' dropped on a technicality and immediately pegged by a competitor. "
Look I don't really care one way or the other, my reference to the Cazaly case, is that they ( Cazaly ) were in law, correct , the minister ( a labor minister who was from Kalgoorlie ) at the time , took the " public interest " route , this and this alone is the connection.
How is the public interest best served here?
CAZALY IRON PTY LTD -v- THE HON JOHN BOWLER MLA, MINISTER FOR RESOURCES & ORS [2006] WASCA 282