Instead of instructing posters to 'read the article,' perhaps you should have quoted whatever may be relevant from the article and added your own commentary. It seems to me that the claim that Baha'u'llah was a manifestation of God is unfounded, and the article is nothing more than a set of empty claims.
Baha'u'llah
The gems of Revelation 21, page-421
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 326 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)