If you read it properly you wouldn't be talking about what is seen in the first page or so. In the paper, the Father is referred to as God, and the Son is referred to as the Manifestation of God If you read it properly, you would have asked for this clarification first. That shows your lack of sincerity that you are quick to accuse others of. The pot calling the kettle black comes to mind. You are also being insincere. You suggest that I ask for clarification, yet when I do you use your your catch praise: "You didn't read the paper properly".
You are right that you have sent me the paper many times, and right that I didn't read the whole document this time. You are wrong that I didn't read it properly on previous occasions.
