"the evidence we have would still support evolution.Some would...

"the evidence we have would still support evolution.
Some would like to crucify those who agree with this for blasphemy.
"Who would this be Whereu?
I didn't say that they would, but that they would like to. I hope that this is true in that they don't actually kill.
The answer is that quite a few who have had a go at me.
...and believe that I will be subject to hell for eternity.
That is what I call a big accusation.
They,the jews and Romans,still dont believe that Jesus was the literal son of God
Jews have their reason for this stand based on their interpretation of their sacred writings; Christians have their views based on their interpretation of scripture. I don't know what yours is.
It comes down to the interpretation of 2000 year old writings.
We know that religious conflict is based on the interpretation of 2000 year old writings.
So you may well be one of them yourself whereu?
I have posted on my interpretation of scripture which is more than Jesus being the Son of God. My interpretation by my understanding lines up with the CC version.
As an analogy, I understand South Africa's apartheid laws and the reasons for their creation but do not believe in them.
In summary, it is possible to understand something without believing in it.
---
The point that I was making is that Christians still argue over the nature of Jesus and have been known to kill over differences.
---
I hope that helps clarify my beliefs for you.