Why? If it doesn't have a significant effect on their bottom...

First 23 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Zonnald

4,277 Posts.

525

07/07/22

14:06

Post #: 62421853
Share

Originally posted by Ramlaw: ↑

I just read this report / comment from you some time ago.

When I dig a bit deeper today over lunch it seems:

1. Womanizer is the No 1 product of Calvista mentioned in the notice calling the meeting as being the product Calvista lost the exclusive distribution rights to.

2. Satisfyer is now listed on Calvista's website as a brand they represent - see https://www.calvista.com.au/AU-our-brands

3. Satisfyer was not listed on Calvista's website in March 2022 - see the archived version from March 2022 of their brands at https://web.archive.org/web/20220601000000*/https://www.calvista.com.au/AU-our-brands

4. Womanizer and Satisfyer are direct competitors, with some website I read suggesting that Womanizer was first to market and Satisfyer is a cheaper version. Just google them and you will see this.

I find it odd that there has been no announcement of distribution rights for Satisfyer being published by Calvista / DLC (other than by adding them to their brands page), when the report itself is clearly relying on the loss of the exclusive distribution rights to. Also, it is interesting that Womanizer is still on Calvista's current our brands page. Does that mean they have lost exclusive distribution rights but retain non-exclusive?

Expand

Why? If it doesn't have a significant effect on their bottom line they are not compelled to make such an announcement. Have they made such product announcements in the past? Seems like a bit of a dumb thing to insist on them announcing.

DLC Price at posting: 1.1¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply