In reference to dont they cancel each other out, well I was suggesting the government was having double standards. One scheme is guaranteeing new supply to market and not tax deductible and the other rewards negative gearing when it will not necessarily increase supply.
Lastly nobody would be negatively geared unless they expected large capital gains or rental yield. Thus the government is supporting higher home prices and higher rents. Isn't this the opposite of what they want in regards to affordable housing??
